General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education

Debeli Belina

doi:doi:10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

| Peer-Reviewed

General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education

Debeli Belina

Published in Science Journal of Education (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 8 October 2021 Accepted: 30 October 2021 Published: 9 December 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the extent of quality assurance implementation from inspection approach and its contribution in quality enhancement and accountability. The study focused on areas of inspection policy frame work and strategies, the trend of external and internal inspection process at General education system. In the investigation qualitative approach used; the study conducted at Jimma Town in Oromiya regional state; in the study two schools purposely selected and 7 respondents have been participated in the study (one education office inspector; two, school principals; two, school department heads and two, teachers). Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data that obtained from Interviews; observation, and document analysis. The study result shows that, in Ethiopia general education context inspection is one of the mechanisms designed to evaluate schools' performance related to input, process, and output. Based on the inspection result schools and concerned bodies are expected to work on school education quality enhancement and students learning outcome improvement. However, the finding of this study indicates that, the inspection strategy designed at MOE did not practically implement as it designed and it has a shortage of linkage to the operational practice. The main reasons are: miss understanding of practitioners on the objective of inspection; the inspection standards lack clarity and have ambiguities to evaluate schools practically; the strategy lack focus to support school management, teacher engagement, pupils, and parents. Also, in practice the external inspection process did not link to school self-evaluation or internal inspection; no mechanism or strategy lay responsibility and accountability on concerned bodies to improve or find a solution on identified problem based on the inspection report. For the effective implementation of the inspection mechanism, the strategic direction that developed at the center should be linked to operational practice and procedures at the district education office and school level; also, the mechanism for holding to responsibility and accountability from the top to school management and all concerned bodies should be designed. The inspection manuals and standards should be revised to evaluate effectively the overall system and tangible things in the schools. The external inspection system also should be linked to the internal inspection mechanism to strengthen school self-assessment practice and to support school improvement plan implementation.

Published in	Science Journal of Education (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
Page(s)	207-220
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Quality Assurance, Inspection, Self-assessment, School Improvement, Accountability, Quality Enhancement, Standards

References

[1]	ACT. (2009). School Improvement Framework: Better Schools. Better Futures Raising Quality and Achieving Excellence in ACT Public Schools. Canberra.
[2]	Allais, S. M (2017). Quality Assurance in Education. Issues in Education Policy, CEPD Centre for Education Policy Development. Braamfontein, Johannesburg.
[3]	Bagaya, J. (2020). School Inspection Practices - Evidence from Secondary Schools in Western Uganda. Journal of Education and Training, Macrothink InstituteCollege of Education and External Studies, Makerere University, Uganda.
[4]	Cedefop, (2015). Ensuring the quality of certification in vocational education and training. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Cedefop research paper; No 51.
[5]	Cerna, L. (2014) Trust: What it is and Why it Matters for Governance and Education, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 108, OECD, Paris Available from: http://www.oecdilibrary.org/education/trust-what-it-is-and-why-it-matters
[6]	Choi, Á. (2019). Education inspection: which models work best? Fundacio Jaume Bofill, ivalua Institute catala dAvaluacia' de politiques publiques., 1-20.
[7]	Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd Editio). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore: SAGE.
[8]	D. Khedker, (2018). quality assurance In secondary school. school Inspection. LAP LAMBERT acedamic publishing.
[9]	DfES. (2016). A Guide to Inspection at primary schools. In D. o. Skills, A Guide to Inspection at primary schools (pp. 1-35). The Inspectorate Department of Education and Skills, Marlborough Street Dublin 1, D01 RC96. This guide may be accessed at www.education.ie.
[10]	Elmore, R. (2001). Holding schools accountable: Is it working? Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 83, No. 1, pp. 67 – 70, 72.
[11]	European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, (2014) Assuring Quality in Education: Policies and Approaches to School Evaluation in Europe. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Ava: http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/178en.
[12]	Grauwe, D. and Noidoo, J. (2014). School Evaluation for Quality Improvment. The Asia Network of training and reaserch institution in education planning (ANTIRIEP) Kuala Lampur, Malisia, with UNESCO.
[13]	Gray, C. & Gardner, J. (2018). The Impact of School Inspections. Oxford Review of Education, Graduate School of Education, The Queen's University of Belfast, publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249005045.
[14]	Green, D. (1994). What Is Quality in Higher Education? Society for Research into Higher Education, London.
[15]	Groups, (2019). Quality assurance for school development. Guiding principles for policy development on quality assurance in schools, 1-41.
[16]	Groups, (2020). Quality assurance for school development. Guiding principles for policy development, Europian commusion.
[17]	Hans, P. (2012), Quality Assurance in an International Higher Education, University of Klagenfurt.
[18]	INQAAHE. (2005). Guidelines of Good Practice. Welington, INQAAHE.
[19]	Kilcolgan, Educate, N. S., Kilcolgan, Co. Galway, (2016). School Inspection Guideline. The Inspectorate Department of Education and Skills Marlborough Street Dublin. Accessed at www.education.
[20]	Lee, B. (2006). Education policy: Process, thems and Impact (Educational policy and Human Capital). Leadership for Learning sereis, Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2006, 41-57.
[21]	MOE. (1994). Ethiopia Education policy. Adis Abeba Ethiopia: Ministery of Education.
[22]	MOE. (2015). Education Sector Development plan ESDP V Program Action Plan. Adis Abeba: Ministory of education.
[23]	MOE. (2018). Ethiopian Education Development Roadmap 2017-2030. Adis Abeba Ethiopia: Ministery of Education.
[24]	MOE. (2011). Governing Guideline for the Implementation of SIP. Addis Ababa: MOE.
[25]	MOE. (2013). National General Education Inspection Framework. Adis Abeba Ethiopia: Ministery of Education.
[26]	MOE. (2013). National General Education Inspection implimentation strategy. Adis Abeba Ethiopia: Ministery of Education.
[27]	MOE. (2013). National school classification framework. Adis Abeba Ethiopia: Ministery of Education.
[28]	O'Day, J. (2002) Complexity, Accountability, and School Improvement. Harvard Educational Review: September 2002, Vol. 72, No. 3, pp. 293-329. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.021q742t8182h238
[29]	OECD.(2020). Evaluation and assesment frame work forimproving school out come common policy chalenge. Education and policy, website www.oecd.org/edu/evaluationpolicy or contact Paulo.Santiago@oecd.org., 1-10.
[30]	Seashore, K., Leithwood K., Wahlstrom K. & Anderson S. (2010). Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning: Final report of Research Findings to the Wallace Foundation, Univeristy of Minnesota. Available from: http://www.wallacefoundation.org/knowledge.
[31]	Stefan, T. (2018). Report on Education in Ethiopia, World Education News, Winner World Education.
[32]	Thomas, G. (1998). A Brief History of the Genesis of the New Schools' Inspection System. British Journal of Educational Studies, Taylor & Francis, Ltd. on behalf of the Society for Educational Studies, Vol. 46, No. 4 p. 415-427.
[33]	University of Twente, (2014). Impact of School Inspections on Teaching and Learning (ISI-TL), Education, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency Available from: http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0ahUKEwi6y8.
[34]	UNESCO. (2016). Designing effective monitoring and evaluation of education systems for 2030: A global synthesiss of policies and practices. Division for Policies and Lifelong Learning Systems (ED/PLS), Section of Education Policy (ED/PLS/EDP).
[35]	UNESCO. (2017). Global Education Monitoring Report Summary: Accountability in Education: meeting out commitments.
[36]	UNESCO. (2004). Indicators of quality and Facilitating Academic Mobility through Quality Assurance Agencies in the Assia Pacific Region. Bangkok: UNESCO and Thailand Accreditation Council.
[37]	UNESCO. (2007). Reforming school inspection for Quality improvement, Reinforcing school-site inspection, module-6. International institute for Educational Planning. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural organization. Retrieved from www.unesco.org/iiep.
[38]	Vroeijenstijn, (1995). International Program Review Electrical Engineering, Vereniging va Samen Wekende Nederelandse Universiiteiten, Utrecht.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Debeli Belina. (2021). General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Science Journal of Education, 9(6), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Debeli Belina. General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Sci. J. Educ. 2021, 9(6), 207-220. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Debeli Belina. General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Sci J Educ. 2021;9(6):207-220. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13,
  author = {Debeli Belina},
  title = {General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {207-220},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  abstract = {The purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the extent of quality assurance implementation from inspection approach and its contribution in quality enhancement and accountability. The study focused on areas of inspection policy frame work and strategies, the trend of external and internal inspection process at General education system. In the investigation qualitative approach used; the study conducted at Jimma Town in Oromiya regional state; in the study two schools purposely selected and 7 respondents have been participated in the study (one education office inspector; two, school principals; two, school department heads and two, teachers). Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data that obtained from Interviews; observation, and document analysis. The study result shows that, in Ethiopia general education context inspection is one of the mechanisms designed to evaluate schools' performance related to input, process, and output. Based on the inspection result schools and concerned bodies are expected to work on school education quality enhancement and students learning outcome improvement. However, the finding of this study indicates that, the inspection strategy designed at MOE did not practically implement as it designed and it has a shortage of linkage to the operational practice. The main reasons are: miss understanding of practitioners on the objective of inspection; the inspection standards lack clarity and have ambiguities to evaluate schools practically; the strategy lack focus to support school management, teacher engagement, pupils, and parents. Also, in practice the external inspection process did not link to school self-evaluation or internal inspection; no mechanism or strategy lay responsibility and accountability on concerned bodies to improve or find a solution on identified problem based on the inspection report. For the effective implementation of the inspection mechanism, the strategic direction that developed at the center should be linked to operational practice and procedures at the district education office and school level; also, the mechanism for holding to responsibility and accountability from the top to school management and all concerned bodies should be designed. The inspection manuals and standards should be revised to evaluate effectively the overall system and tangible things in the schools. The external inspection system also should be linked to the internal inspection mechanism to strengthen school self-assessment practice and to support school improvement plan implementation.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education
AU  - Debeli Belina
Y1  - 2021/12/09
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 207
EP  - 220
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
AB  - The purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the extent of quality assurance implementation from inspection approach and its contribution in quality enhancement and accountability. The study focused on areas of inspection policy frame work and strategies, the trend of external and internal inspection process at General education system. In the investigation qualitative approach used; the study conducted at Jimma Town in Oromiya regional state; in the study two schools purposely selected and 7 respondents have been participated in the study (one education office inspector; two, school principals; two, school department heads and two, teachers). Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data that obtained from Interviews; observation, and document analysis. The study result shows that, in Ethiopia general education context inspection is one of the mechanisms designed to evaluate schools' performance related to input, process, and output. Based on the inspection result schools and concerned bodies are expected to work on school education quality enhancement and students learning outcome improvement. However, the finding of this study indicates that, the inspection strategy designed at MOE did not practically implement as it designed and it has a shortage of linkage to the operational practice. The main reasons are: miss understanding of practitioners on the objective of inspection; the inspection standards lack clarity and have ambiguities to evaluate schools practically; the strategy lack focus to support school management, teacher engagement, pupils, and parents. Also, in practice the external inspection process did not link to school self-evaluation or internal inspection; no mechanism or strategy lay responsibility and accountability on concerned bodies to improve or find a solution on identified problem based on the inspection report. For the effective implementation of the inspection mechanism, the strategic direction that developed at the center should be linked to operational practice and procedures at the district education office and school level; also, the mechanism for holding to responsibility and accountability from the top to school management and all concerned bodies should be designed. The inspection manuals and standards should be revised to evaluate effectively the overall system and tangible things in the schools. The external inspection system also should be linked to the internal inspection mechanism to strengthen school self-assessment practice and to support school improvement plan implementation.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Debeli Belina

Education and Behavioural Science College, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Debeli Belina. (2021). General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Science Journal of Education, 9(6), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Debeli Belina. General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Sci. J. Educ. 2021, 9(6), 207-220. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Debeli Belina. General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education. Sci J Educ. 2021;9(6):207-220. doi: 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13,
  author = {Debeli Belina},
  title = {General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education},
  journal = {Science Journal of Education},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {207-220},
  doi = {10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjedu.20210906.13},
  abstract = {The purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the extent of quality assurance implementation from inspection approach and its contribution in quality enhancement and accountability. The study focused on areas of inspection policy frame work and strategies, the trend of external and internal inspection process at General education system. In the investigation qualitative approach used; the study conducted at Jimma Town in Oromiya regional state; in the study two schools purposely selected and 7 respondents have been participated in the study (one education office inspector; two, school principals; two, school department heads and two, teachers). Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data that obtained from Interviews; observation, and document analysis. The study result shows that, in Ethiopia general education context inspection is one of the mechanisms designed to evaluate schools' performance related to input, process, and output. Based on the inspection result schools and concerned bodies are expected to work on school education quality enhancement and students learning outcome improvement. However, the finding of this study indicates that, the inspection strategy designed at MOE did not practically implement as it designed and it has a shortage of linkage to the operational practice. The main reasons are: miss understanding of practitioners on the objective of inspection; the inspection standards lack clarity and have ambiguities to evaluate schools practically; the strategy lack focus to support school management, teacher engagement, pupils, and parents. Also, in practice the external inspection process did not link to school self-evaluation or internal inspection; no mechanism or strategy lay responsibility and accountability on concerned bodies to improve or find a solution on identified problem based on the inspection report. For the effective implementation of the inspection mechanism, the strategic direction that developed at the center should be linked to operational practice and procedures at the district education office and school level; also, the mechanism for holding to responsibility and accountability from the top to school management and all concerned bodies should be designed. The inspection manuals and standards should be revised to evaluate effectively the overall system and tangible things in the schools. The external inspection system also should be linked to the internal inspection mechanism to strengthen school self-assessment practice and to support school improvement plan implementation.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - General Education Quality Assurance: The Extent of Quality Assurance Implementation from Inspection Approach in Ethiopia General Education
AU  - Debeli Belina
Y1  - 2021/12/09
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
T2  - Science Journal of Education
JF  - Science Journal of Education
JO  - Science Journal of Education
SP  - 207
EP  - 220
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2329-0897
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjedu.20210906.13
AB  - The purpose of this empirical study was to investigate the extent of quality assurance implementation from inspection approach and its contribution in quality enhancement and accountability. The study focused on areas of inspection policy frame work and strategies, the trend of external and internal inspection process at General education system. In the investigation qualitative approach used; the study conducted at Jimma Town in Oromiya regional state; in the study two schools purposely selected and 7 respondents have been participated in the study (one education office inspector; two, school principals; two, school department heads and two, teachers). Thematic analysis method was used to analyze the data that obtained from Interviews; observation, and document analysis. The study result shows that, in Ethiopia general education context inspection is one of the mechanisms designed to evaluate schools' performance related to input, process, and output. Based on the inspection result schools and concerned bodies are expected to work on school education quality enhancement and students learning outcome improvement. However, the finding of this study indicates that, the inspection strategy designed at MOE did not practically implement as it designed and it has a shortage of linkage to the operational practice. The main reasons are: miss understanding of practitioners on the objective of inspection; the inspection standards lack clarity and have ambiguities to evaluate schools practically; the strategy lack focus to support school management, teacher engagement, pupils, and parents. Also, in practice the external inspection process did not link to school self-evaluation or internal inspection; no mechanism or strategy lay responsibility and accountability on concerned bodies to improve or find a solution on identified problem based on the inspection report. For the effective implementation of the inspection mechanism, the strategic direction that developed at the center should be linked to operational practice and procedures at the district education office and school level; also, the mechanism for holding to responsibility and accountability from the top to school management and all concerned bodies should be designed. The inspection manuals and standards should be revised to evaluate effectively the overall system and tangible things in the schools. The external inspection system also should be linked to the internal inspection mechanism to strengthen school self-assessment practice and to support school improvement plan implementation.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download